Bloggers of The Americas

Mexico reminds me of what happened in Colombia.

February 7, 2010 · 2 Comments

 

Iván Gerardo Cruz - Author/Contributor of Bloggers of The Americas

Iván Gerardo Cruz - Author/Contributor of Bloggers of The Americas

Among all countries in The Americas , Mexico and Colombia are two of the american nations with greater Hispanic historical, literary, visual arts and cultural heritage. They also enjoy the good reputation of giving birth to the most beautiful women on the continent, comparable only, to be fair, with the Venezuelan and Puerto Rican.

Their cuisines are envied in many places. And when partying or going to a musical concert to there is no better way than going to see Shakira, Juanes and Vives, or why not with Paulina Rubio, Maná, Julieta Venegas and Luis Miguel. But unfortunately not everything is rosy for these two beautiful countries. They also share the greatest scourge that a state and society can have : drug trafficking.
Drug traffickers in both countries have historically been partners in the more lucrative and dangerous “business” in the world. For over 30 years, thousands of tons of cocaine have been sent from Colombia to Mexico, via different routes. Theses cocaine shipments  later end up in Europe and the U.S., where the largest number of consumers are.

From 1985 to 1995, Colombia lived a decade of terror that killed over  twenty thousand people due to the great crusade of the Colombian state security forces battling against drug trafficking. Then, the Colombian  Cartels were fighting using  all its devastating force to prevent the signing of an extradition treaty with the United States.

During that time and for over five years, Colombians live with all types of terrorist attacks, especially car bombs. Politicians, judges, magistrates, prosecutors, military, police, lawyers, human rights defenders, and even athletes were victims of the drug cartels and its cruel bombs and murderous bullets.

Extradition to the U.S. of  Gonzalo Rodríguez Gacha

Gilberto Rodríguez Orejuela, alias El Ajedrecista

They were also thousands of victims who died in the war between the same drug Cartels: in Cali, the Valle del Norte, Medellin and the Atlantic Coast. Their own families, in many cases, paid with great pain for the betrayal, theft and showdowns.
Today, Mexico reminds me of those years in Colombia, when terrorist attacks were the daily bread, when police chiefs were shot every week, when the massacres did not longer astonished the people , not even the most naive and innocent of the Colombian peasants.

Death of Pablo Escobar

Death of Pablo Escobar

In those days no one could feel safe being in any public market or mall. At any moment a car bomb could explode , in any place, it could be outside the mall or a bomb in an elevator, within the same site. Every week, whole families appeared killed , caused by Colombian Mafia vendettas, ordered by murderous drug lords like Pablo Escobar and Gonzalo Rodriguez Gacha.

Tragic own goal of Andrés, lately assasinated in Medellín.

Tragic own goal of Andrés, lately assasinated in Medellín.

In Mexico, cases like the player of the soccer team América, Salvador Cabañas, who although has not been linked to Mexican drug, can now show us the degradation and insecurity prevailing in Mexico City caused largely by the power of drug traffickers who make and unmake according to their will. Those images immediately took me back to Medellin and I do remember the absurd death of Andrés Escobar, footballer of the Atlético Nacional and player of the Colombian national soccer team. He was just 24 years old, and was killed by gunmen at the service of drug traffickers, assassinated only because he accidentally scored one goal against his own team during  the World Football Championship of U.S. 94.  When I think of this heinous crime, I still can not believe it really happened.

Those years were extremely difficult for the good guys in Colombia. In cities like Cali and Medellin was very dangerous to go out to a disco with your partner without encountering a defiant and brutish drug lord , full of bodyguards, dressed outlandishly, who wanted to dance with your girlfriend or wife, or in worst cases, taking her with him. It was the price millions of Colombians had to pay for a little over ten years to get rid of     the terrorism and barbarism of the narcos.

President fo Mexico Felipe Calderon and President of Colombia Alvaro Uribe, face the same challenge.

President of Mexico Felipe Calderon and President of Colombia Alvaro Uribe, face the same challenge.

Only through a tenacious warfare determined and conducted by the Colombian state, and with the cooperation of other governments and the use of high technology,  Colombia started gradually with the process of defeating the wild bunch of drug lords who managed to kneel the country, by bribing the Justice and the politicians and by intimidating the colombian society.

 However, and unfortunately, the drug has not been totally defeated in Colombia. Many insist that today Colombia exports more tons of cocaine than 20 years ago. Fortunately and somewhat to mitigate the sad feeling for failing to exterminate  all of these criminals, the new drug dealers also understood in a way that an open struggle against the Colombian state was what least suited them and that sooner or later they were going to lose, like Pablo Escobar Gaviria missed.
So now these criminals work in another way: quietly. They do not show their wealth and they do operate using a low profile, even many are lawyers or business managers and they managed to publicly appear as such. As a comfort to many, at least now Colombia does not live in the midst of death and the terrorist attacks of that time.
I personally have the feeling that governments can do more to tackle drug traffickers in a more strongly way, but unfortunately it is even stronger the corrupting power of drug money, able to turn almost anybody, from senior generals of the republic , to a minister of justice, or judge, even the most ’straight’ from the police corporals.

You don´t need to be a soothsayer  to realize that the Mexican society and institutions are going through the same thing : hard times on account of the struggle that President Felipe Calderón declared against the narco.
Nor is it a secret that the outcome of this battle during the last three years in Mexico are not what everyone expected or else just ask former Foreign Secretary Castañeda,  and that the efforts of the Mexican Armed Forces and the Police apparently are too weak  to successfully confront  the Mexican drug cartels and its power  both militarily and economic , of corruption and intimidation of Mexicans, by using barbaric methods far more vicious and cruel that they met and still practiced in Colombia.
Colombian experts in the anti-narcotics fight,  as well as Colombian police and military, frequently travel to Mexico City and other Mexican cities in order to give theoretical  lectures and dictate practical courses, workshops, seminars and in schools, on matters about how best to prepare for and counter the violent methods used by the Mexican cartels.

Castañeda argues that Mexico shouldn´t  have declared war on narco.

Jorge Castañeda, Mexico's foreign minister under Fox, had spied for Cuba, according to declassified report published by El Universal, February 4th, 2008 and by PoliticalWarfare.org

Jorge Castañeda, Mexico's foreign minister under Fox, had spied for Cuba, according to declassified report published by El Universal, February 4th, 2008 and by PoliticalWarfare.org

Now what really strikes me is that the former Mexican Foreign Minister Jorge Castañeda,  just a few days ago,  said in his column in the newspaper El Pais in Spain, that President  Calderón was wrong when he decided to openly declare war on Mexican drug traffickers.

Obviously Castañeda is the wrong one, although his arguments does have enough weight to be exposed in the way he did, and maybe many will think that his thesis could be right. That’s why his words should be analyzed in depth.
The fact that they are not great results in the fight against the Mexican cartels, despite several sharp blows of the state, including the capture of drug lords and a number of extraditions to the United States, does not justify Castañeda´s  hasty statements on the issue and can´t dismiss the performance of the Mexican security agencies.
Castaneda goes further and compares Irak with Mexico. He says that the war in Iraq and the war against drug trafficking in Mexico were choices made by the governments, both wars difficult to win and they should not have taken. In regard to the Mexican case, his argument is based in large part,  in the increasing of  the homicide rate,  overflowed after the crusade against cartels. He said that before the war declaration, it was only 10 homicides per 100 thousand inhabitants in Mexico, behind countries like Brazil (25 ), Colombia (37) and Venezuela (48).
Now , what Mr. Castaneda forgot to mention in his controversial column is the analysis of  the levels of corruption to which Mexican officials came before Calderon, thanks to the ability of penetration and infiltration of drug traffickers in the institutions of justice, government and the armed forces of the state,  to break the will of much of the country and to act at ease before the blind eyes of the Vicente Fox administration.
It was therefore necessary to change in Mexico, to change attitudes, government, president, and to recuperate the moral values. That is why  the whole country applauded Calderon’s decision to declare war on drugs in Mexico, and to face a very serious problem that threatened to turn Mexico into a narco-state as it came to be under the governments in  Colombia of the former presidents Cesar Gaviria, Ernesto Samper and Andres Pastrana, being the Colombian President Gaviria –also former secretary of the OAS- the one in charge of waging the war that ended with the death of Pablo Escobar and the apparent weakening of the Cartel´s of that time in Colombia .

In this way the Mexicans have begun in recent years to restore the morale of its public officials, its police, its armed forces, governors and their society. It is clear that the Mexican war on drugs is just in the starting phase and it also for sure that they can not win by themselves, they need the assistance of other countries, and it is also unfortunately clear  the war will last for at least another decade, remaining optimistic.

They will need strong support from the U.S. and its technology, they will also need the help of Colombia and its experience in this field.  But more than that, they are going to need the goodwill and continuity of the next governments to come in Mexico.  They will need another Calderón,  or perhaps Calderón himself, just to finish the hard work.
Castañeda may not be that wrong.  Maybe he is right when he says that the way to defeat drug traffickers is not the armed confrontation with the drug lords and Cartel´s  and maybe his view is as valid as that of former Presidents Henrique Cardoso of Brazil, Ernesto Zedillo of Mexico and Cesar Gaviria of Colombia, that is to decriminalize the minimum personal consumption of illegal narcotics as the most feasible alternative to end the great scourge in Colombia, Mexico, United States and around the world.
But  the former minister  was wrong to say that Calderón´s decision was a failure, or that the president´s act was crazy, insane.  Without a clear legal framework to combat drug trafficking in Mexico, the only way to defeat them was by declaring war and starting a armed struggle. And now  Calderon and Mexico are on the right track, in spite of the growing number of victims, which often are part of the conflict and are not as innocent as people think through the news.
If Calderon had not acted in time in Mexico, the drug mafia  would be far more powerful today, the country would be completely penetrated by the tentacles of the drug mob and the mexican society would be adrift amid a dark landscape dominated by dirty money and  criminality.
The hardest time is to come. Mexico still does not reach its “ Proceso 8,000 ” – this was a chapter of the Colombian war on drugs in which the fragile Colombian justice put into trial dozens of politicians, businessmen, journalists, and members of the same justice system, who were bribed by drug money in exchange for favors.

The fight against drug trafficking in Mexico should continue, strongly and decisively.  Hitting the big “capos”  with strength , weakening the structure of the cartel´s, boosting the morale of the armed forces and especially of the Mexican justice, and to prevent corruption of officials are the main tasks. Not easy to achieve but not impossible. So Mexico reminds me of what Colombia experienced.

→ 2 CommentsCategories: 1 · hemispheric security latin america · integration · military · national security U.S.A. · politics · war on drugs · world affairs
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Obama: ‘You have to legislate using common sense’

February 4, 2010 · Leave a Comment

 

Iván Gerardo Cruz - Author/Contributor of Bloggers of The Americas

Iván Gerardo Cruz - Author/Contributor of Bloggers of The Americas

Never before the traditional presidential speech “State of the Union” –that was addressed  before a full United States Congress-  did generate as many expectations as the one of President Barack Obama last Wednesday , when he reported for his first year as head of the White House. I have not seen the ratings, but I’d bet that even Hillary Clinton herself, from London, did listen to it.

Of course the euphoria of the congressional Democrats contrasted with the apathy and the long faces of the Republicans, who have not left Obama govern the way he want to, and who this year will make a even stronger opposition to the Democratic policies,  as they face their political future in the next November´s midterm elections

So the president speech was direct, precise and very blunt about government priorities and the need to govern for the people, for the middle class, which has been experiencing the hardest hit due to the terrible crisis that we still live in the Great Union.  And his speech was nor made to satisfy  Wall Street and the four lobbyists of always, the owners of big oil multinationals and the big pharmaceutical companies of this  country, always struggling to avoid taxes and achieve better contracts.

United States President  Barack H. Obama

United States President Barack H. Obama

In his  “State of the Unions” speech,  Obama made an appeal to Republicans and Democrats to urge them to legislate and put their political  interests in a secondary position , putting ahead the interests and need  of tens of millions of Americans saturated with their debt and problems.

The best of his speech came when he inferred to both Republicans and Democrats, using  a jocular tone, to legislate using  ’common sense’.

It was there when he hit home, by using the words ‘Common sense’.

 Because without using common sense  the only thing that will happen in the U.S. Congress will be  a big headache for all of them and heated discussions that will lead to nothing and then the major reforms of health and immigration will remain a dream for the less privileged in this country. Not to be negative but the two issues are rather complicated to pass.
I wonder why a tourist that has an accident in Spain or Italy or in the most of the European countries  is treated like a citizen, without having to file a social security card or health insurance? And best of all is that medical services are free.
Should not be the same here , in this country, being the one and only super power in the world ? Sure, it should be like in Europe. But lawmakers legislate just for them and their lobbyist friends. It is there where the changes should occur.  
It is difficult to understand, that  in the 21st century more than 10 million children of this great Union are without access to health coverage, and still 12 million immigrants, most  of them with American children  - and who have no criminal records-  must continue living in the dark due to the political struggle  of the same U.S. parliamentarians.
The only “crime” of these immigrants is that they work too hard , also in order to support their families in their home countries, and everyone knows that.  But the political struggle over both sides of Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington DC is now to avoid encouraging twelve  million people who work ten times harder than any American.
Health, even before education, should be a full right for all people in the United States and should even be for free as in many European countries.  If there is enough budget to fund two or three wars in the world, why not fund a free health program for the most needy?
During his speech, Barack Obama asked Congress if anyone had a better idea to make a more comprehensive health reform that will convince all Republicans and Democrats.

 
It’s amazing that there is no consensus.

I bet  that this health reform could have passed the Colombian Congress by now, in spite of all its bureaucracy, patronage and lobbyists.  Maybe I dare to submit a project to President Obama, or even easier, we could send a fax to the U.S.Congress with all information on the European health model, which apparently works quite well.

Hopefully the Republicans and conservative Democrats will react and become more aware of the needs of the people, and put those needs above their narrow personal interests.

It is about time that Washington DC governs for the three hundred million Americans and not for a bunch of lobbyists and a handful of billionaires. Please, use common sense.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Barack Obama · Immigration · health · integration · politics
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

United States: “Adios” to immigration reform, once again.

February 1, 2010 · 2 Comments

Malena Marchan Contributor of Bloggers of The Americas

Malena Marchan Contributor of Bloggers of The Americas

 Today I had pan de miga sandwiches with a Chilean friend at an Argentinean restaurant in Miami. The food is great, the service is fantastic, plus you can buy the best wine from Mendoza, alfajores, longanizas and all sorts of delicacies from that great South American country.

The restaurant is always full of customers, mostly from Latin America. After all it is located in a Hispanic neighborhood called Doral.

While I sat there and looked at people eating I wondered how many where undocumented, although many did not fit the image most Americans have of Latino immigrants. We Hispanics know that not all Latin American immigrants in the United States come running across the border to pick tomatoes at a farm in California or nannies in New York City. Many, specifically the ones with college education managed to came with tourist visas and have been able to stay. Some managed to get good jobs despite the fact they don’t have work permits, while others, the ones the media focuses on, are the less educated people that seek jobs in agricultural and construction.

Whatever education they have had, there are more than 12 million immigrants living and working illegally in the United States. Some say the number could be as high as 20 or 30 million.

U.S. Congressman Luis V. Gutierrez - Representative of constituents in Illinois` Fourth District

U.S. Congressman Luis V. Gutierrez - Representative of constituents in Illinois` Fourth District

House Representative, Luis Gutierrez of the Democratic Party, doesn’t worry about how many there are or where they are from. He wants to legalize their status and incorporate them to society and to the economy as well.

I congratulate him for presenting the Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America’s Security and Prosperity Act of 2009 (CIR ASAP).

His proposal contemplates a path to U.S. citizenship for immigrants who have played by the rules. This means that they’ve paid taxes and have not been convicted for any crime. It also addresses family reunification which has become a big problem because of the issue of deportations. Many children born in the United States to undocumented foreign parents have been separated from them because they were deported. I’ve been with children in that situation and it’s horrible and inhumane.

United States President  Barack H. Obama

United States President Barack H. Obama

Another provision is aimed at reducing immigration backlogs and assist immigrant students pursuing an education here. National security and effective enforcement measures are also included in this bill proposal as well as improving conditions of detention, verifying employment authorization and improving conditions of detention.

Many of these issues have been addressed in other bills presented in the past and although everyone acknowledges the immigration system is broken and President Barack Obama wants to approve something this year, I’m not very optimistic.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

In 2005 and 2006 immigration reform proposals where debated in Congress and Senate, but none solved the dilemma of what to do with the millions of undocumented workers. The only thing that was approved was the border fence. Why would 2010 be any different?

Legislators are not interested in this. Midterm elections are in November and as things are right now, no politician will risk his seat by endorsing a bill that addresses such a touchy subject. People are interested in the economy and getting their jobs back.

When I covered Latinos issues, legislators used “war on terrorism” and security as a pretext to increase control at the borders and that’s how the border fence was approved. The entire debate on what to do with millions of undocumented workers turned into a security issue.  At the end of the day, the flow of immigrants was controlled but the problem of what to do with the ones inside the country was completely forgotten.

Immigration reform is like health reform, everyone knows that the system is broken and it must change but there are so many interest groups involved that will be affected with the changes that it is very hard to do anything.

Another thing is that whether we like it or not, there is an anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States. I recently spoke to an editor at the Southern Poverty Law Center, a non-profit organization that monitors hate groups and he told me that the sentiment against Latinos is strong.

A  new study released by the Center of American Progress says that legalizing undocumented workers would yield 1.5 trillion dollars to the US economy in the next 10 years, but this is hard to believe if they are downsizing your company or your best friend is about to lose his house.

If the economy doesn’t pick up nobody will be interested in immigration. How do you convince Americans that have lost their work that legalizing millions of immigrant’s workers and making the come out of the shadows will not jeopardize their intents to get a job?

Latino Students at Princeton University

Latino Students at Princeton University

As far as the H-1B visa which a foreign worker can obtain if he is sponsored by a company in the United States, there are only 65,000 available per year. We still have to see if Congress is willing to double this figure as it did in 2000 with the boom of the dotcoms. But if there are no jobs out there I don’t see why they would extend the H-1B program.

Like 2005 and 2006 in 2010 adios immigration reform!

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Barack Obama · Immigration · Immigration Reform · U.S. Citizenship and Immigration · business · economics · economy · government · integration
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

! Welcome, Piñera !

January 23, 2010 · 2 Comments

Conservative Sebastián Piñera Wins Chilean Presidential Electi

Conservative Sebastián Piñera Wins Chilean Presidential Electi

This movie requires Adobe Flash for playback.

Ivan Gerardo Cruz - Author/Contributor of Bloggers of The Americas

Ivan Gerardo Cruz - Author/Contributor of Bloggers of The Americas

The polls had already predicted it.. Sebastián Piñera is the newly elected president of Chile after defeating  in the elections the center-left former President Eduardo Frei.
The triumph of the billionaire businessman of 59 years represents a major change in the  more socialist country of the continent, in the past 50 years. And the outcome of this election brought us two clear premises of the current political world which in turn clearly reflects the need for a change in Chile.

Photo of Sebastian Piñera, the day of the elections in Chile.

Photo of Sebastian Piñera, the day of the elections in Chile.

The first premise is that no political model for stronger and more consolidated it seems, is able to retain power for itself and will never be stronger than the popular will of the people. And that is where Sebastian Piñera managed to change the political tide in accordance to the majority of the Chileans that already were looking for a political change since 2005. The Chilean socialist model had forgotten the people and to accomplish its political promises and Piñera capitalized all this in his campaign in order to get the necessary votes and thus boost his reformist ideas.
The second premise is that politics have also ideological cycles oscillating in periods which a range between 10 and 20 years, so the Chileans now opted for change, it was about time, and the political right wing is back in the most socialist country in South America.

Sebastián Piñera and Mario Vargas Llosa

Sebastián Piñera and Mario Vargas Llosa

The Chileans have made their country a model avant-garde at the time of leading major changes and once again have demonstrated at the ballots, despite having one of the highest living standards in The Americas and an economic model worthy of emulation. So the land of Pablo Neruda and Gabriela Mistral decided to bet once again for new great social changes and for  having a capitalist future much more ambitious and modern. Good for them!

Chile has everything that is required  to start dreaming again, and most important, Chile has all what is needed to  make those dreams a true reality.

 
I’m sure the most pleased with the success of Piñera is the Colombian President Álvaro Uribe Vélez, who will have in Chile a new and transparent partner from now one, to work hand in hand in several of the problems that are affecting the region .

 
We Colombians have always dream having an ambitious capitalist future such as Chile´s, with government programs that allow us to enter the first world through the front door.  Unfortunately we have not been able to organize our own home and put an order to a myriad of problems that have not allowed our  successive governments to move as they pleased.
With Uribe in power, Colombia is fighting to build the foundation needed to obtain an important  economic, social and security model , to enable the country to follow the lead of Chile to the first world.

Hence the need for a third term for  Uribe , that would enable the country to completely eliminate the problems of public order and security, and also sign the FTA with the United States.

the-presidential-candidate-of-the-ruling-coalition-eduardo-frei-right-embraces-opposition-candidate-sebastian-pinera-who-won-the-runoff-presidential-election-in-chile

the-presidential-candidate-of-the-ruling-coalition-eduardo-frei-right-embraces-opposition-candidate-sebastian-pinera-who-won-the-runoff-presidential-election-in-chile

Chile was the first country to do so in South America. That could define a once and for all strong governmental policy to curb the great scourge of drug trafficking- perhaps the only solution is a legalization of the consumption – so to work more effectively favoring  progress, employment generation, economic growth and social investment in fundamental areas such as education and health.

With the advent of Piñera to power , the one that surely is not happy is the madman Chavez, who lost the sympathy of a country that apparently listened to him. This triumph of the right is a serious blow to the famous Chavez’s Bolivarian revolution and its expansionist zeal in the region.
Piñera’s victory could be just the first big setback for Chavez in 2010, since during the second half of the year it is predicted that Brazil could also turn right , in the next general elections in Brazil.
Without Chile and Brazil aligned in the socialist side and much closer to the U.S., and the latter’s military facilities installed in Colombia for the war on drugs, the future of the Chavez revolution at the international level will have a difficult year where anything can happen, even he leaving the government.
In addition Chavez must face the serious internal problems of Venezuela, ranging from electricity and water rationing – the most basic services – the new currency devaluation, the expropriation of more businesses,  to the banking crisis. So,  Chavez will have a dark year in Venezuela, and I repeat, anything could happen.

 
Venezuelans are tired, and Chavez has no the same popular support which once he had when he attained power through elections.  Gradually, he is  becoming increasingly isolated, and  internationally some of his ‘partners’ also seem to be seeing things differently.

 
Socialism in South America seems to be downhill and the Right recovered significant ground with Sebastian Pinera. Will Brazil follow  the path of Chile this year? What other countries will return to the right?
What better country than Chile to show the region that there is no perfect model and that capitalism and the right remain in force and are a better alternative government for any country. Welcome Sebastian Piñera!

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Barack Obama · Hugo Chavez · business · economics · economy · government · hemispheric security latin america · integration · international politics · international trade · leadership · political · politics · society · world affairs
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

REGIONAL BALANCE: TODAY CHILE, TOMORROW BRAZIL.

January 18, 2010 · Leave a Comment

 

Victor Bjorgan - The Publisher of Bloggers of The Americas

Victor Bjorgan - The Publisher of Bloggers of The Americas

Sebastian Piñera won yesterday the presidential elections in Chile, obtaining 51.6% of the vote against 48.4 of the official candidate Eduardo Frei.
To gain a parliamentary majority, the new government must achieve political agreements with any of the parties of the center-left Concertación. Perhaps Eduardo Frei’s Christian Democrats are the  natural allies that will give governance to Piñera. The new president needs to have a political opposition acting constructively.

In his first public statement after being defeated, Eduardo Frei hoped that “dialogue will prevail, the search for agreements and the need to maintain the social gains that we worked so hard to recover and have become a symbol of our relationship with the world.”

 Piñera’s conservative victory is the first one since 1958 when Jorge Alessandri won the elections. Of course the democratic Piñera has nothing to do with the dictator Pinochet. They are two very different things. To start with, Piñera won peaceful and democratically with the 51% of the vote.

This victory means the end of 20 years in power of the Democratic Coalition, the coalition of four center-left parties.

Paradoxically the defeat of the Coalition occurred  when President  Michelle Bachelet, has a 80% popularity, which could not endorse it to their candidate, former President Frei, who ruled the country between 1994 and 2000.

Although Piñera must secure parliamentary majorities, Chile faces an encouraging economic outlook. The country is recovering from the international financial recession. And the main generator of resources, copper, is at record high prices, and Chile has a reserve fund of 12 billion dollars.

Sebastian Piñera - President Elect of Chile

Sebastian Piñera - President Elect of Chile

 Being a multimillionaire, and in order to silence criticism, Piñera delegated in April 2009 the administration of much of his fortune to a trust  where he does not intervene in any of the business decisions. He will also sell his shares of the Chilean airline LAN before assuming his duties on March 11.

With the Conservative victory in Chile, South America is now divided into two major blocs.

 A group of countries with center-right governments located to the west of the subcontinent, to the Pacific Ocean:  Colombia, Peru and Chile.

The other group of nations is more diverse politically speaking, in spite of being all of them leftists. These group is located to the east over the Atlantic Ocean with four left-populist governments, from the quasi-dictatorship of Hugo Chávez in Venezuela, to the populist Peronist style governments in Argentina and Uruguay, and Lula in the Brazil, which despite his skills  and positive outcomes for Brazil can hardly be transferred  to a candidate of his own political party: the PT.

 We will have to see what happens in next October’s presidential elections in Brazil. It appears that the left can not win as Lula has no good replacement and if that occurs, South America definitely has a chance to become an important part of the Western Hemisphere, inserting the region in a big way in the XXI Century, starting a path of prosperity and security for its people.

 Therefore, what the title says, there is fresh air again touring the continent. Today Chile, in October hopefully also Brazil.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: 1
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Narcotics War: Mexico’s Drug Cartels

January 17, 2010 · 2 Comments

By Colleen W. Cook – Analyst in Latin American Affairs

According to the Mexican government there are seven drug cartels operating in Mexico. The Mexican government reports that the major cartels – Gulf, Sinaloa, and Juárez — are present in much of Mexico. 

Suspected Mexican drug trafficker Vicente Carrillo Leyva is presented to the media in Mexico City April 2, 2009. Carrillo is the son of Amado Carrillo Fuentes, the founder of the Juarez cartel

Suspected Mexican drug trafficker Vicente Carrillo Leyva is presented to the media in Mexico City April 2, 2009. Carrillo is the son of Amado Carrillo Fuentes, the founder of the Juarez cartel

The Juárez cartel has been found in 21 Mexican states and its principle bases are: Culiacán, Sinaloa; Monterrey, Nuevo León; the cities of Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, and Ojinaga, Chihuahua; Mexico City; Guadalajara, Jalisco; Cuernavaca, Morelos; and Cancún, Quintana Roo. The Sinaloa  cartel has a presence in 17 states, with important centers in Mexico City; Tepic, Nayarit; Toluca and Cuautitlán, Mexico State; and most of the state of Sinaloa.

In 2007, 15 of the world´s most violent and ruthless criminals including Osiel Cardenas-Guillen (photo), the kingpin of the Gulf Cartel were extradited to the U.S.

In 2007, 15 of the world´s most violent and ruthless criminals including Osiel Cardenas-Guillen (photo), the kingpin of the Gulf Cartel were extradited to the U.S.

The Gulf cartel is present in 13 states with important areas of operation in the cities of  Nuevo Laredo, Miguel Alemán, Reynosa, and Matamoros in the northern state of  Tamaulipas. The Gulf cartel also has important operations in Monterrey in Nuevo  León; and Morelia in Michoacán.

Drug kingpin, Francisco Javier Arellano Felix, in DEA custody as he arrives in San Diego Thursday Aug. 17, 2006

Drug kingpin, Francisco Javier Arellano Felix, in DEA custody as he arrives in San Diego Thursday Aug. 17, 2006

In addition, the Tijuana cartel is present in at least 15 states with important areas of operation in Tijuana, Mexicali, Tecate, and Ensenada in Baja California and in parts of Sinaloa.  In recent years, the major cartels have formed alliances with one another; the two rival alliances now compete for turf.

Eduardo Arellano (Tijuana Cartel) at the Federal Police hangar being presented to the press.

Eduardo Arellano (Tijuana Cartel) at the Federal Police hangar being presented to the press.

The Tijuana cartel formed an alliance with the Gulf cartel as a result of prison negotiations by their leaders. Several cartels have  also formed an alliance known as “The Federation.” The Federation is led by representatives of the Sinaloa, Juárez, and Valencia cartels. The cartels work  together, but remain independent organizations. In August 2006, Mexico’s Deputy Attorney General for Organized Crime, José Luis Santiago Vasconcelos, indicated that this reorganization, and mounting violence, are the result of Mexico’s success in capturing  cartel leadership.

From January 2000 through September 2006, the Mexican government arrested over 79,000 people on charges related to drug trafficking. Of these arrests, some  78,831 are low level drug dealers. Mexico also arrested 15 cartel leaders, 74  lieutenants, 53 financial officers, and 428 hitmen (sicarios).   Mexican authorities arrested nearly 10,000 people on drug-related charges from December 2006 through August 2007.5 On August 16, 2006, the United States Drug Enforcement  Administration (DEA) and Coast Guard arrested Tijuana cartel leader Francisco Javier Arellano Felix, along with other Tijuana cartel leaders, on a boat off the  Mexican coast.6 His brother, Francisco Rafael Arellano Felix, was extradited to the United States in September 2006. In January 2007, Mexico extradited 15 persons  wanted for prosecution in the United States, including four senior drug traffickers.

Arrest of Ismael Higuera Guerrero

Arrest of Ismael Higuera Guerrero

The drug traffickers included Osiel Cárdenas Guillén, the alleged head of the powerful Gulf cartel, who is believed to have maintained control of the cartel since his 2003 imprisonment. Ismael Higuera Guerrero and Gilberto Higuera Guerrero of  the Tijuana cartel led by the Arellano Felix family; and, Hector Palma Salazar of the Sinaloa cartel and a leader of the Federation alliance were also extradited to the  United States. From January through August 2007, Mexico extradited 64 suspected criminals to the United States, compared to the record 63 alleged criminals extradited to the United States in 2006.

 Drug Trafficking

Mexico, a major drug producing and transit country, is the main foreign supplier of marijuana and a major supplier of methamphetamine to the United States.Although Mexico accounts for only a small share of worldwide heroin production,it supplies “a large share of the heroin distributed in the United States.” The State Department estimates that 90% of cocaine entering the United States transits Mexico.

 In the United States, wholesale illicit drug sale earnings estimates range from $13.6 to $48.4 billion annually.

 Mexico’s cartels have existed for some time, but have become increasingly powerful in recent years with the demise of the Medellín and Cali cartels in Colombia. Closure of the cocaine trafficking route through Florida also pushed cocaine traffic to Mexico, increasing the role of Mexican cartels in cocaine trafficking. 

The National Drug Intelligence Center is the antinarcotics arm of the U.S. Department of Justice

The National Drug Intelligence Center is the antinarcotics arm of the U.S. Department of Justice

The National Drug Intelligence Center now considers Mexican drug cartels as dominating the U.S. illicit drug market. According to the Center, Mexican cartels “use their well-established overland transportation networks to transport cocaine, marijuana, methamphetamine, and heroin – Mexican and increasingly South American – to drug markets throughout the country.” 

 Colombian groups continue to “maintain significant control over South American cocaine and heroin smuggling and distribution in the eastern United States, although their role has diminished as that of Mexican groups has expanded.”

Jose Luis Santiago Vasconcelos, killed in November 2009  in a mysterious plane crash over Mexico City, is among three senior federal law-enforcement officials named in an April 21 page DEA briefing.

Jose Luis Santiago Vasconcelos, killed in November 2009 in a mysterious plane crash over Mexico City, is among three senior federal law-enforcement officials named in an April 21 page DEA briefing.

In February 2006, Mexico’s Deputy Attorney General for Organized Crime, José Luis Santiago Vasconcelos, asserted that Colombians continue to control drug trafficking in Mexico. The DEA, however, maintains that the Mexican cartels now have command and control over the drug trade and are starting to show the hallmarks of organized crime, such as organizing into distinct cells with subordinate cells that operate throughout the United States. As a result of their dominance of the U.S. illicit drug market, Mexican cartels are the leading wholesale launderers of drug money from the United States. Mexican and Colombian trafficking organizations annually smuggle an estimated $8.3 to $24.9 billion in drug proceeds into Mexico for laundering.  

Mexican cartels also produce methamphetamine and marijuana in the United  States. Mexican cartels have long grown marijuana in the United States, often on federal land in California, but they are now expanding production to the Pacific northwest and, to a lesser extent, the eastern United States.  Mexican marijuana producers in California, the Pacific northwest, and eastern United States are increasingly linked to each other and  any of these groups maintain their affiliation with the larger groups in California and Mexico and maintain some level of coordination and cooperation among their various operating areas, moving labor and materials to the various sites – even across the country – as needed.

There is evidence that Mexican cartels are also increasing their relationships with prison and street gangs in the United States in order to facilitate drug trafficking within the United States as well as wholesale and retail distribution of the drugs. For example, in January 2006, the National Drug Intelligence Center reported that gangs such as the Latin Kings and Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) buy methamphetamine from Mexican drug cartels for distribution in the southwestern United States.

According to the FBI, Mexican cartels focus only on wholesale distribution, leaving retail sales of illicit drugs to street gangs. The Mexican cartels reportedly work with multiple gangs and do not take sides in U.S. gang conflicts. In addition to drug trafficking, Mexican cartels have been tied to both human and arms trafficking, auto theft, and kidnapping.

  Mexican drug traffickers increasingly smuggle money back into Mexico in cars and trucks, likely due to the effectiveness of U.S. efforts at monitoring electronic money transfers. Mexican law enforcement officials note that while the drug cartels may sometimes traffic persons who are willing to act as mules, they do not engage in large-scale human trafficking as that would add further risk to the transit of drug shipments. Separate criminal groups focus on human trafficking.

 U.S. law enforcement officials report that the Tijuana cartel has been weakened due to the arrests and deaths of several cartel leaders, forcing the cartel to focus its energies on controlling trafficking routes through the corruption of Mexican law enforcement officials and intimidation measures, including kidnapping, torture, and murder.

Enforcer Gangs

Three suspected arrested sicarios.

Three suspected arrested sicarios.

Mexican cartels employ individuals and groups of enforcers, known as sicarios. In August 2006, Mexico’s Deputy Attorney General for Organized Crime, José Luis Santiago Vasconcelos, postulated that these gangs are becoming increasingly powerful as they fill the void left in cartels when their leadership are arrested by the Mexican government. The Mexican government arrested over 300 sicarios from January 2000 through September 2006, with Gulf cartel enforcers accounting for over one-quarter of arrests. This included 134 enforcers from the Gulf cartel, 107 from the Tijuana cartel, 98 from the Sinaloa cartel, 66 from the Juárez cartel, 15 from the Millennium cartel, 6 from the Oaxaca cartel, and 2 from the Colima cartel. Some analysts speculate that the Gulf cartel lost more of its enforcers because of greater exposure due to their mobility throughout Mexico defending Gulf cartel territory and competing for new territory.

The Gulf and Sinaloa cartels also employ more disciplined groups respectively known as the Zetas and Negros. In July 2006, the Mexican daily Reforma reported findings of a Mexican federal investigation that the Gulf cartel is recruiting MS-13 gang members and Guatemalan Kaibiles. 

 Mexican and U.S. law enforcement officials, however, deny that there are significant ties between Mexican cartels and MS-13, indicating that the cartels will work with Central American gangs on specific  tasks, but that these gangs are not as disciplined as the cartels, so the cartels have not deepened ties with them.

 Gulf Cartel

Mexican police officers escort suspected members of the ZETAS drug cartel during a presentation to the media.

Mexican police officers escort suspected members of the ZETAS drug cartel during a presentation to the media.

 The Zetas are unique among drug enforcer gangs in that they operate “as a private army under the orders of Cárdenas’ Gulf cartel, the first time a drug lord has had his own paramilitary.” Most reports indicate that the Zetas were created by a group of 30 lieutenants and sublieutenants who deserted from the Mexican military’s Special Air Mobile Force Group (Grupo Aeromovil de Fuerzas Especiales, GAFES) to the Gulf cartel in the late 1990s. As such, the Zetas were able to carry out more complex operations and use more sophisticated weaponry. The Zetas were instrumental in the Gulf cartel’s domination of the drug trade in Nuevo Laredo, and have fought to maintain the cartel’s influence in that city following the 2003 arrest of its leader Osiel Cárdenas.

 Press reports have charged that these soldiers turned cartel enforcers were trained in the United States; however, the Washington Office on Latin America was unable to confirm this claim while researching a June 2006 special report on drug violence.19 Estimates on the number of Zetas range from 31 to up to 200. Reports indicate that while the Zetas were initially comprised of members of special forces, they now include federal, state, and local law enforcement personnel as well as civilians. In September 2005 testimony to the Mexican  Congress, then-Defense Secretary Clemente Vega indicated that the Zetas had also hired at least 30 former Guatemalan special forces (Kaibiles) to train new recruits because “the number of former Mexican special forces men in their ranks had shrunk from 50 to no more than a dozen, and they were finding it hard to entice more members of the Mexican military to join.”

Norberto Jimenez Martinez, one of the leaders of THE ZETAS gang

Norberto Jimenez Martinez, one of the leaders of THE ZETAS gang

 The Zetas act as assassins for the Gulf cartel. They also traffic arms, kidnap,and collect payments for the cartel on its drug routes. Mexican law enforcement officials report that the Zetas have become an increasingly sophisticated, three-tiered organization with leaders and middlemen who coordinate contracts with petty criminals to carry out street work.

 The Zetas have maintained the territory of the Gulf cartel in the northern cities of Matamoros and Nuevo Laredo following the 2003 arrest of the Gulf cartel leader, Osiel Cárdenas. In addition to defending the cartel’s terrain in northern Mexico, Zetas are believed to control trafficking routes along the eastern half of the U.S.-Mexico border.

 Although initially found mainly along Mexico’s northern border, the Zetas now have a presence in southern Mexico, where the Gulf cartel is disputing territory previously controlled by the Juárez and Sinaloa cartels. A recent federal investigation found that the Zetas also engage in kidnapping, drug dealing, and money laundering.

In July 2006, local police in the southern state of Tabasco unknowingly arrested Mateo Díaz López, believed to be a leader of the Zetas. The arrest prompted an assault on the police station killing 4 people, including 2 police officers, but the assault did not succeed in liberating Díaz López, who was subsequently transferred to a prison in Guadalajara.

 The Zetas also trained the Michoacán-based “La Familia” enforcer gang which has carried out numerous executions in that state. The Familia maintains close ties to the Zetas, but are a smaller entity.

Sinaloa Cartel

In response to the Zetas, the Sinaloa cartel established its own heavily-armed enforcer gangs, the Negros and Pelones. Both are less sophisticated than the Zetas, and focused on attacks against adversaries. Edgar “La Barbie” Valdés Villarreal is alleged to be the head of the Negros. The Negros are believed to be “responsible for the recent rise in attacks against police officers in Nuevo Laredo, in an attempt to wrest control over the local police from the Zetas.”

Dec. 17,2009,  With the assistance of U.S. intelligence experts, Mexican forces on Wednesday killed Arturo Beltran Leyva, a notorious Mexican drug lord, in a violent two hour shootout.

Dec. 17,2009, With the assistance of U.S. intelligence experts, Mexican forces on Wednesday killed Arturo Beltran Leyva, a notorious Mexican drug lord, in a violent two hour shootout.

 In recent turf wars in Tamaulipas, Guerrero, Michoacán, Nuevo León, and Tabasco, the Zetas have alleged that the Sinaloa cartel and Negros leader “La Barbie,” enjoy police protection. The Mexican government dismissed these charges, noting that it has at varying times focused on prosecutions of different cartels, and each time the affected cartel charges that the government is working on behalf of a rival organization. In May 2006, “La Barbie” made similar allegations of police protection of the Zetas in a full-page ad in a Mexico City daily.

 Police Corruption

Mexico Drug War Police Cleanup

Mexico Drug War Police Cleanup

Mexican cartels advance their operations, in part, by corrupting or intimidating law enforcement officials. For example, Nuevo Laredo municipal police have reportedly been involved in the kidnapping of Gulf cartel competitors to hand over to the Zetas. The Zetas then hold them for ransom or torture them for information about their drug operations. The International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) reports that although Mexico has made concerted efforts to reduce corruption in recent years,  it remains “a serious problem.”

 Recent efforts to combat corruption include promoting professionalism in law enforcement agencies and inclusion of rule of law lessons in training. Nevertheless, the INCB recommends that Mexico continue to promote efforts to combat corruption. 

Some agents of Mexico’s Federal Investigative Agency (AFI) are believed to work as enforcers for the Sinaloa cartel, and the Attorney General’s Office (PGR) reported in December 2005 that one-fifth of its officers are under investigation for criminal activity. The PGR reported in late 2005 that nearly 1,500 of AFI’s 7,000 agents were under investigation for suspected criminal activity and 457 were facing charges. In November 2005, a video depicting the interrogation of four Zetas who revealed their methods of torture, ties to Mexican law enforcement agencies, and recruitment techniques, was given to the Dallas Morning News. The video ends with the murder of one of the Zetas.

 The Mexican government sent mixed signals about the involvement of AFI agents in the kidnapping of the Zetas, first announcing that eight agents were under investigation, and then announcing that AFI agents had no connection to the kidnapping and murder of the four Zetas.

 However, a report from a non-governmental organization says that “subsequent U.S. and Mexican press reports based on Mexican court files have concluded that AFI agents probably kidnapped the Zetas in the resort city of Acapulco, then handed them over to members of the Sinaloa cartel to be interrogated and executed.”  In recent years, the Mexican federal government conducted purges and  prosecution of police forces in Nuevo Laredo; Apatzingan, Michoacán; and, Tijuana, Baja California.

 The Fox administration launched Operation Secure Mexico in June 2005 to combat drug violence and police corruption in cities with high incidences of drug violence. Federal officers arriving in Nuevo Laredo were fired on by municipal police leading to the arrest of 41 municipal police and the suspension of the entire 700-member Nuevo Laredo police force to investigate corruption. Less than one-half would be cleared to return to duty.  In late June 2005, federal police rescued 44 people, the majority of whom claimed that they had been kidnapped by municipal police before being transferred to Gulf cartel safe houses.

 In spite of these efforts, reports indicate that the Zetas continue to have influence over Nuevo Laredo’s municipal police, and that warring cartels are gaining influence in all law enforcement present in the city. In 2006, Mexico launched the Northern Border (Frontera Norte) initiative, a federal-state effort to fight violence that included the deployment of 800 Federal Protective Police (PFP) officers to Nuevo Laredo.

  These 800 officers are in addition to the 300 federal officers deployed in Nuevo Laredo under Operation Secure Mexico. In March 2006, four PFP officers were killed after locating a cartel safe house.

Federal officials announced that initial evidence indicated that municipal police officers were responsible for the killings.  

The anti-cartel operations begun by President Calderón in December 2006 included ballistic checks of police weapons in places such as Tijuana where there is concern that police are also working for the cartels. In April 2007 over 100 state police officers in the northern state of Nuevo León were suspended due to corruption concerns. In June 2007, President Calderón purged 284 federal police commanders, including federal commanders of all 31 states and the federal district. These commanders were suspended and subjected to drug and polygraph tests. The Mexican government immediately named replacements for the 284 dismissed commanders. The new commanders all successfully passed an array of examinations designed to weed out corrupt officers, including financial checks, drug testing, and psychological and medical screening. These tests are to be repeated on a regular basis.

Turf Wars

The 2002 arrest of Benjamin Arellano Felix, head of the Tijuana cartel, and the 2003 arrest of Gulf cartel head Osiel Cárdenas, led to a realignment of Mexican cartels and increased turf wars.  While in prison, Arellano Felix and Cárdenas forged an alliance against the Sinaloa cartel and its ally the Juárez cartel. Cartels are now largely aligned into two blocks in support of the Gulf and Sinaloa cartels.

 Mexican Government Response

 Since taking office in December 2006, President Calderón has made combating drug cartels and drug violence a top priority of his administration. He has called increasing drug violence in Mexico a threat to the Mexican state, and has sent 24,000 soldiers and federal police to nine states to combat the cartels. Mexico’s Attorney  General, Eduardo Medina Mora, indicated in April 2007 that the government’s anticartel initiative will expand beyond counter-cartel police and military operations to include institutional and operational reforms. He also stated that the only way Mexico can successfully defeat the cartels unless it gets more cooperation from the United States in combating arms trafficking and money laundering from the United States to Mexico.

Mexico´s Special Forces Airmobil Group , Grupo Aeromovil de Fuerzas Especiales, GAFES

Mexico´s Special Forces Airmobil Group , Grupo Aeromovil de Fuerzas Especiales, GAFES

 In October 2007 the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy reported that the Mexican government’s increased pressure on cartels coincided with cocaine shortages in 37 U.S. cities and a 24% increase in the retail price of cocaine during the second quarter of 2007.  President Calderón maintains that his administration will stand up to threats of violence by the cartels and that it will take at least two years to take back control of Mexico. While many support the government’s plan, critics note that drug violence continues. According to press reports, a Mexican government report charged that “the cartels remain intact and executions have spread to previously violence-free areas.”

Press reports indicate that between 1,800 and 1,900 Mexicans were killed in cartel related violence in the first nine months of 2007; the Mexican government does not maintain statistics on cartel murders.  In addition to the anti-drug operations, President Calderón has increased salaries of troops involved in counter-cartel operations by nearly 50%; placed the Federal Preventative Police (PFP) and the Federal Investigative Agency (AFI) under one commander as part of his plans to create a unified federal police force; and announced the “Platform Mexico” initiative to improve federal, state, and local law enforcement capacity to exchange information on drug cartels, including the creation of a database that will cover 5,000 police stations by 2009.

President Calderón has indicated that he will use extradition as a major tool to combat drug traffickers. In January 2007, Mexico extradited 15 persons wanted for prosecution in the United States, including four senior drug traffickers: Osiel Cárdenas Guillén, the alleged head of the powerful Gulf cartel; Ismael Higuera Guerrero and Gilberto Higuera Guerrero of the Tijuana cartel led by the Arellano Felix family; and, Hector Palma Salazar of the Sinaloa cartel.

 From January through August 2007 Mexico extradited 64 suspected criminals to the United States, compared to the record 63 alleged criminals extradited to the United States in 2006. 

U.S. Counternarcotics Assistance to Mexico

Mrs. Sevil Atasoy INCB President met UN Secretary Gral Ban Ki Moon to review and discuss international drug control issues

Mrs. Sevil Atasoy INCB President met UN Secretary Gral Ban Ki Moon to review and discuss international drug control issues

Mexico is one of the largest recipients of U.S. counternarcotics assistance, though it receives significantly less assistance than larger programs in Afghanistan or Colombia. The United States provides counternarcotics assistance to Mexico through the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) account.

MICHELE LEONHART,acting Administrator of the DEA

MICHELE LEONHART,acting Administrator of the DEA

The Administration’s budget request for FY2008, $27.8 million, cuts U.S. counternarcotics assistance to Mexico by 22% compared to Fiscal Year FY2007 levels. In its Congressional Budget Justification, the State Department contends that these cuts are appropriate because Mexico is the thirteenth largest economy in the world. Since FY2002, border security programs have typically accounted for about 35% of INCLE assistance to Mexico. Other major components of INCLE assistance include aviation support; operational support for Mexico’s drug interdiction and eradication programs; and, professionalization and training of Mexican law enforcement personnel.

 Policy Approaches and Debates

Current U.S. counternarcotics policy toward Mexico focuses on the interdiction and eradication of drug shipments, primarily through border security screening efforts along the U.S.-Mexico border. Supporters of U.S. counternarcotics policy maintain these efforts have disrupted drug shipments and decreased rates of drug use among American youth. Some critics of current policy call for an expansion of U.S. counternarcotics efforts beyond the conventional law enforcement approach. The Calderón administration has also called for increased U.S. efforts in areas it considers critical in combating drug trafficking and cartel violence.

 The President’s National Drug Control Strategy for 2007 asserts that the Administration is following a balanced drug strategy that focuses on: prevention of drug use; treatment; and disrupting the illicit drug market. In the last five years significant achievements have been made in reducing youth use of LSD, Ecstasy, and methamphetamine.

“Corona” Augustin Zambrano Among 18 Alleged Latin Kings Gang Leaders in Little Village Region, Chicago,  Indicted on Federal Charges

“Corona” Augustin Zambrano Among 18 Alleged Latin Kings Gang Leaders in Little Village Region, Chicago, Indicted on Federal Charges

 The Administration maintains that domestic and international CRS-15 Government Accountability Office, “Drug Control: U.S. Assistance Has Helped Mexican Counternarcotics Efforts,” August 2007. Office of National Drug Control Policy, National Drug Control Stategy – FY2008 Budget 

Summary. 

Law enforcement efforts against drug trafficking not only disrupt the drug supply but are key to combating the corrosive impact of the drug trade on societies and governments. By countering the influence of drug trafficking organizations, U.S. assistance helps countries improve security; increase economic development; and improve the rule of law. Enforcement efforts against drug cartels are also a key element of protecting U.S. national security. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently determined that U.S. assistance has successfully improved Mexico’s capacity to combat drug trafficking. The GAO noted that cooperation between the countries has improved significantly in recent years, but that there is room for further cooperation. GAO pointed to the need for an agreement to allow U.S. law enforcement to board Mexican vessels at high seas when those vessels are suspected of carrying drugs.

 GAO also called for increased surveillance cooperation and for the United States to coordinate its border narcotics strategy with Mexico. 

Non-governmental groups and individuals have advocated alternative strategies.For example, in his recent book High Society, Joseph Califano, the president of the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA) at Columbia University, argues for more assertive international counternarcotics efforts. He maintains that counternarcotics has long taken a back seat to other foreign policy concerns, be it the Cold War or terrorism.

Former mexican attorney general Eduardo Medina Mora, resigned in 2009.

Former mexican attorney general Eduardo Medina Mora, resigned in 2009.

Califano contends that this has resulted in reduced  diplomatic pressure on drug producing countries that are needed as allies in other endeavors. He has stated that prevention of illicit drug flows into the United States should be a foreign policy priority and that United Nations drug treaties should be strengthened. He also calls for increased penalties for drug traffickers and stronger banking laws to prevent money laundering.

 The non-governmental organization Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) called for a combination of U.S. domestic programs and targeted foreign aid to Mexico in its June 2006 report on cartel violence in Mexico, State of Siege: Drug-Related Violence and Corruption in Mexico. WOLA suggested cutting cartel revenue by reducing U.S. demand for illicit drugs through improved drug prevention education and increasing access to addiction treatment. Drug prevention and treatment programs (including research) currently account for 35% of U.S. federal counterdrug spending.

WOLA  Office in Washington DC

WOLA Office in Washington DC

 Yet, WOLA reports that only one-third of U.S. schools offer  drug prevention curricula shown to effectively reduce drug use and calls for increased funding to guarantee that schools are using effective drug prevention curricula.  WOLA also calls for reducing arms trafficking into Mexico by requiring background checks for all U.S. gun purchases and limiting the number of weapon and ammunition purchases to prevent the re-sale and trafficking of weapons legally purchased in the United States to Mexican cartels. In Mexico, WOLA calls for restoration of public order and support of judicial and police reforms to create effective oversight mechanisms to detect and deter police corruption.  Finally, WOLA notes that Mexican authorities currently lack the investigative capacity to solve drug crimes, including murder of police officers, and calls on Mexico to extradite major criminals to the United States, which has the institutional capacity to successfully prosecute major drug traffickers.

Michael Shifter, of the Inter-American Dialogue, also calls for renewed focus on demand reduction and reduction in arms trafficking from the United States. He notes that many Latin American nations resent what they consider to be the United States’ unilateral approach to counternarcotics policy and calls for increased multilateral efforts. Shifter maintains that weak institutions, poverty, and social exclusion in Latin America, make Latin American nations, including Mexico, more vulnerable to drug trafficking and cartel violence. He suggests that counternarcotics efforts may be more successful if they address these systemic problems which enable drug cartels to gain power and influence.

In 2007, four police officers and seven civilians accused of working for Mexico’s powerful Gulf drug cartel were detained in Nuevo Laredo, across the border from Laredo, Texas.

In 2007, four police officers and seven civilians accused of working for Mexico’s powerful Gulf drug cartel were detained in Nuevo Laredo, across the border from Laredo, Texas.

 The Mexican government has become increasingly critical of U.S. counternarcotics efforts. It contends that its counternarcotics efforts will fail without more U.S. support to: reduce arms trafficking into Mexico; stop the trafficking of drug earnings into Mexico; and reduce Americans’ demand for illicit drugs. Requesting assistance from the United States is a sensitive issue in Mexico, a country that traditionally has been wary of U.S. intervention. U.S. criticism of drug trafficking and crime in Mexico is perceived by many to be unfair because most of the drugs being trafficked through Mexican territory are for consumption in the United States. Recent criticisms of the United States by President Calderón and other Mexican officials likely seek to address these concerns and to frame the drug trafficking issue as one of shared responsibility between the United States and Mexico.

 Other U.S. counternarcotics efforts, most notably the Andean Counterdrug Initiative, include funds for alternative development programs to encourage drug crop farmers to switch to production of licit crops.

 The United States does not fund alternative development programs in Mexico.

 Mexican officials interviewed for this report indicated that Mexico also does not fund alternative development programs in marijuana and opium poppy growing regions of the country. These officials suggested that there is a weaker correlation between poverty and drug crop cultivation in Mexico than in other countries in the region. 

As of October 2007, the two countries are reportedly negotiating a new counternarcotics assistance package. Such a package has not been discussed before in part because of distrust between the countries which began to improve under President Vicente Fox (2000-2006). President Calderón’s prioritization of anti-cartel efforts represents an opportunity in U.S.-Mexico relations. As of the date of this report, the U.S. and Mexican governments have not released detailed information on the reported plan.

Media are reporting that the Government Accountability Office GAO will release today a report connecting weak and uncoordinated US gun policy to Mexico’s surge in violence.

Media are reporting that the Government Accountability Office GAO will release today a report connecting weak and uncoordinated US gun policy to Mexico’s surge in violence.

 The Miami Herald reported on October 16, 2007, that Stephen Johnson, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Western Hemisphere, indicated that amount, duration, and composition of assistance are still under negotiation. Nevertheless, he reportedly suggested that the U.S. assistance package could total $1.5 billion with another $7 billion coming from Mexico.

 The project may also include drug transit countries in Central America. In early October, Mexico’s Deputy Foreign Minister for North American Affairs, Carlos Rico, announced that the United States would provide $1 billion in military assistance to combat drug cartels. The aid would be given over a period of two years. Both Johnson and Rico affirmed that no U.S. troops would be deployed in Mexico. Johnson noted that the aid program would be a “historic” opportunity to improve U.S.-Mexico relations and cooperation.

 

U.S. Capitol Hill Building

U.S. Capitol Hill Building

Note of The Publisher: This document was produced in 2007 and do not include the news from the PLAN MERIDA (new US assistance for Mexico and Central America). This document  is a very interesting excerpt of the Report of the Congressional Research Service, prepared by Colleen W. Cook  for members and Committees of  the U.S. Congress, October 16, 2007. We give full credit to the author Colleen W. Cook for this valuable research, that enlightened our knowledge about the extent of the war on narcotics in Mexico

→ 2 CommentsCategories: 1 · 2009 Barack Obama · US Aid for Development · armaments · arms trade · army · business · economy · government · hemispheric security latin america · military · national security · national security U.S.A. · national seecurity america · political · politics · society · war · war on drugs · weapons · world affairs
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Can the international humanitarian aid reach the people of Haiti, on time?

January 16, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Haiti Earthquake Caught on Tape

Haiti Earthquake Caught on Tape

This movie requires Adobe Flash for playback.

  

  

Sergio Alexis Fernández - Contributor of Bloggers of The Americas

Sergio Alexis Fernández - Contributor of Bloggers of The Americas

International journalists, diplomats, NGO representatives and spokesmen of the Haitian government  agreed that the situation in Haiti is chaotic after the earthquake that devastated  Port au Prince, whose deaths exceed 50,000 sources, according to the Panamerican Health Organization.  

A man looks for a body among hundreds of earthquake victims at the morgue in Port-au-Prince, Thursday, Jan. 14, 2010. A 7.0-magnitude  earthquake struck Haiti Tuesday.

A man looks for a body among hundreds of earthquake victims at the morgue in Port-au-Prince, Thursday, Jan. 14, 2010. A 7.0-magnitude earthquake struck Haiti Tuesday.

 

Tens of thousands of Haitians are seeking for help in Port-au-Prince, walking distressed and crying for their dead while their own situation is desperate.. The bodies are visible along the streets of the city, or lie under the rubble.  

Meanwhile, thousands of survivors are afraid to return to their flimsy houses without electricity and they prefer to spend hours in open places, where groups sing traditional songs in the darkness and pray for the victims, waiting for God to do something.  

A injured haitian man carries his dead daughter

A injured haitian man carries his dead daughter

 

  

Several planes carrying food and trained personnel flew for hours around Port-au-Prince without being able to land due to the problems in the airport runaways, lack of ground light signals, the destruction of the air control tower , the traffic jam due to the thousands of  civilians who want to leave, and the many  aid packages from different countries that rescuers are trying to get to Port au Prince, having to return to Miami and Santo Domingo.  

To try to alleviate the situation, the United States had to take over the airport, but although it began to operate 24 hours per day, the airport is very small and is too damaged to be an efficient solution to the situation, as stated by State Department Spokesman Philip Crowley.  

And from the neighboring Dominican Republic the permits to pass the borders  into Haiti are slow due to lack of vaccines and safety.   

A man makes his way amidst hundreds of lifeless bodies in Port-au-Prince

A man makes his way amidst hundreds of lifeless bodies in Port-au-Prince

 

The world community is doing a lot trying  to reach Haitians with food, medicine and  technical support, but this aid does not reach to those who are affected, and the people due to the shortage of water, food, lack of health services and growing insecurity, are choosing to do justice by their own hands. 

There have been several cases of Haitians who have set up barricades in the streets with corpses in protest over the delay of the international aid.  

All this is happening because of the  poor organization that is responsible for distributing the international aid and also due to the overstretched lines of communication with the population, that roams looking for sustenance.  

A man gestures behind a person trapped in the rubble of a collapsed building in Port-au-Prince

A man gestures behind a person trapped in the rubble of a collapsed building in Port-au-Prince

 

It was reported that yesterday a group of looters broke into a supermarket in the Delmas area, carrying bags of rice, while other draw gasoline from any car that is unguarded.  

A UN spokesman reported that stores of the World Food Program have been looted by successive groups of Haitians. “Our stores were looted in Port au Prince. Resupply will be necessary,” said spokeswoman Emilia Casella.  

“It’s impossible to find food even with money, there is nothing to buy,” said Liliane Pierre-Pau photographer of Radio Kiskeya, becoming more critical the situation of  the most disadvantaged population such as infants, elderly, and sick.
 
Periodically you can  hear gunshots, resulting in more uncertainty and chaos.  

Injured Person during Haiti Earthquake

Injured Person during Haiti Earthquake

 

Today, the problem for the success of the humanitarian aid is the lack of effective logistics and security. There is no appropriate organization to be responsible for getting aid to the affected sectors, and no adequate enforcement to ensure that aid operation, such as the police who are engaged in rescuing victims from under the rubble.
   

In a well said statement of  the UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-moon “People from all over the world want to help” , but unfortunately the arrival of international humanitarian aid without a proper coordination is not benefiting the local victims of the disaster.
And in the case of humanitarian aid this is a finding that also can be done in other third world countries, were humanitarian aid slowly reaches its final destination ,  and if not, the aid is lost on the road because of looting –done more or less spontaneously-, or the action of organized gangs who seek to harness the chaos , looking for quick profit.  

The bodies of earthquake victims are moved to a truck by a bulldozer

The bodies of earthquake victims are moved to a truck by a bulldozer

 

In many Third World countries, the structural weakness of the state and its organizations like the security forces prevented the democratization of the aid. That aid can be reached by the real victims. In this the African continent has a long history.  

Isn´t  it time that the countries of our continent acknowledge that their own structural inefficiencies do not allow them to reach their people with the international aid?  

Do not happen that these losses suffered by international aid donors can make them to disbelieve  and restrict their donations due to the uncertainty of what happens to them?  

Haitian man carrying an injured child.

Haitian man carrying an injured child.

 

Is not it time that supranational organizations, such as the Organization of American States OAS, make emphasis on the need of creating a specific program  that provides the foundation in each country to receive and properly distribute international cooperation?  

And this applies both to aid in crisis situations and also for  international cooperation in more peaceful times.  

HAITI EARTHQUAKE NUMBERS AT A GLANCE

→ Leave a CommentCategories: 1 · US Aid for Development · integration · international politics · internationjal aid Haiti · leadership · national security · national security U.S.A. · world affairs
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Yankees go home?

January 14, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Malena Marchan Contributor of Bloggers of The Americas

Malena Marchan Contributor of Bloggers of The Americas

In the 1970’s the United States organized coup d’états and moved and removed Latin-American presidents from power. In the eighties it was the big multinationals eating away the regions natural resources while Washington armed right winged paramilitary groups. 10 years later the drug war went into full speed and the Drug Enforcement Administration sent undercover agents to monitor operations in the region.

For all of this and more, many Guatemalans, Ecuadorians, Chileans, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans as well as people from other countries, the United States has been criticized and hated for what its enemies have referred to as meddling in other countries affairs.

And to make matters worse, one of the many things that annoyes many Latin–American people is that the U.S has become owner of the word America. It uses it to refer to everything, like its people as well as its values; American values, American sentiment, American honor etc., etc. They don’t realize Central Americans, North Americans and South Americans are Americans too since they all come from the American continent.

 The funny thing is that Washington has also been criticized for not doing anything like the case of Honduran president Manuel Zelaya, who was ousted from power last June.

United States USAID is helping in Haiti

United States USAID is helping in Haiti

No matter all the bad things people can say about the Americans; that they are arrogant, show offs, know it all and that they have no real culture but McDonalds and Sears,  there is no country as helpful and solidary  as the United States of America.

It has been the first to send aid to Haiti where news reports say there could be more than 3 million people affected directly by the massive quake and thousands of deaths.

President Barack Obama sent ships to the island with provisions, special rescue teams with dogs as well as tons of rescue equipment. Some of the navy vessels sent are equipped with state of the art medical facilities and possibly equipment Haitians hospitals don’t have or are short of.

 The earthquake was last Tuesday and I’ve already received emails from different organizations and friends asking for donations. I know that small Latin American countries have also pledged support and aid, but it’s the United States that everyone judges.

Strangely when it’s a natural disaster, there is silence and nobody says anything because they know the one of the first ones there will be are the gringos.  Nobody thanks them. I have never seen the front of a newspaper write in bold letters, “The United States send millions to help the victims”, or “U.S the first to arrive at the scene”.

Aid in Haiti

Aid in Haiti

I don’t remember of any recent disaster in which the United States or its people have just stood and watched. On the contrary, this country led the reconstruction efforts after the Tsunami in Thailand in 2004, probably one of the worst disasters of this decade. The then President George Bush gave more than 300 million dollars in aid.

Today, in the case of Haiti, a mobile phone operator company said it would donate 5 million dollars for relief efforts, while 2 shipping and delivery companies are also contributing with similar amounts to help the Red Cross. Banks, manufacturing companies as well as mayor retailers are also giving their share.

Meanwhile, the Florida Panthers hockey team said that it would collect donations in its next two home games.

From that latest news reports I read, emergency teams in Haiti don’t have enough body bags or the capacity to tend to the victims. To make matter worst,  there’s hundreds of people unaccounted for and the photos and videos aired on television portray a horrible and chaotic situation.

In Facebook, I wrote an email to a Haitian friend asking for her family. It looks like everyone is fine but she’s devastated and very preoccupied. She asked me to pray for a better tomorrow for her country. Haiti was destroyed by a hurricane a year ago and has managed to gain stability after months of political turmoil and violence in 2004. Now this…

I was once heard a journalist friend say that the poorest country he had been to was Haiti. “If you want to see poverty and misery, go to Haiti. It’s shit!” those where his exact words. I cannot imagine how difficult the situation must be now.

And once again, it’s the United States sending aid and thousands of “Americanos” showing us that despite their McDonalds culture, they are the first to help the needy.  Then when they suffer terrorist attacks, they don’t understand why.

According to the 2000 Census, there are more that 400.000 native born Haitians in the United States. Florida and New York have the highest number.

I would be naïve not to think that Washington has an agenda just like all the other companies donating money and relief. But you know what? I prefer someone that is being proactive, no matter what their agenda is, than someone that says they have no personal interests and does nothing at all.  Yanquis, don’t go home. We need you.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: 1 · US Aid for Development · economics · government · hemispheric security latin america · human rights · integration · international politics · leadership · national security U.S.A. · opinion · politics · society · world affairs
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,